A Pretty Solid Buy

Bold you don't go an XG35VQ with a dead pixel, I recollect this Asus monitor is a pretty solid buy. It packs about all the features you'd want from a high-end monitor of this shape and size at a cost that's amidst the cheapest, from a major brand, for the specs. That'due south commonly the combination of ingredients of a winner.

The XG35VQ's build quality is nifty. The blueprint is a little too gamer for my taste, but I exercise appreciate features like slim bezels and an easy-to-navigate OSD with a directional toggle. At that place's plenty of connectivity and a flexible stand, forth with an RGB ring on the dorsum that doesn't make a lot sense.

Color performance is solid, with adequate out-of-the-box colors and enough of room for elite calibration. The display is bright, the VA panel technology allows for a loftier LCD contrast ratio, there'southward little (if whatever backlight bleed), and viewing angles are very good. Response times are typical for a VA display, and then non every bit good as TN, but nonetheless serviceable for most gaming.

The merely existent complaint I take is with the brandish uniformity, which is a problem with a lot of curved monitors, and plain the dead pixel mine shipped with that I promise almost all buyers wouldn't have to face up. Proceed this monitor in listen if 3440x1440 ultrawide gaming is your matter, particularly if you take an AMD graphics menu.

The Asus XG35VQ can currently exist bought for $800, which is around the everyman price on the market for this panel and specifications from a proper noun make. You tin save a few dollars with older variants from less reputable brands, simply I'll leave it upwardly to you to decide whether y'all want to risk it.

Shopping Shortcuts:

  • Asus ROG Strix XG35VQ on Amazon, Newegg

Pros: Skilful value for the features you get. High resolution, 100Hz ultrawide. Solid pattern with reasonably slim bezels and easy-to-navigate OSD. Proficient color functioning; bang-up if calibrated.

Cons: Poor uniformity. My review unit had a dead pixel.